Human rights or civil liberties form a crucial part of a country's constitution and govern the rights of the individual against the state. |
Xuquuqda aadanaha ama xorriyadaha madanigu waxay ka yihiin qayb muhiim ah dastuurka waddan waxayna xukumaan xuquuqda qofka ee ka dhanka ah dawladda. |
Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a codified constitution, with a bill of rights. |
Awoodaha sharci intooda badan, sida Maraykanka iyo Faransiiska, waxay leeyihiin dastuur ka degsan xuquuqda qofku leeyahay. |
A recent example is the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which was intended to be included in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, that failed to be ratified. |
Tusaale dhawaa waa Heshiiska Xuquuqda Aasaasiga ah ee Midawga Yurub kaasi loogu talogalay inuu kujiro Heshiiska aasaasidda Dastuur Yurub leedahay, kaasi lagu fashilmay in la meelmariyo (ansixiyo). |
Perhaps the most important example is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights under the UN Charter. |
Laga yaabee tusaalaha ugu muhiimsan waa Baaqa Caalamiga ah ee Xuquuqda Aadanaha ee ku qoran Heshiiska Qaramada Midoobay (UN). |
These are intended to ensure basic political, social and economic standards that a nation state, or intergovernmental body is obliged to provide to its citizens but many do include its governments. |
Kuwan waxa loogu talogalay xaqiijinta istaandarrada aasaasiga ah ee siyaasadeed, bulsho iyo dhaqaale kuwaasi oo dawlad, ama urur dawladaha ka dhexeeya lagu waajibiyey inuu siiyo muwaadiniintiisa laakiin qaar badan waxay ku daraan dawladaheega. |
Some countries like the United Kingdom have no entrenched document setting out fundamental rights; in those jurisdictions the constitution is composed of statute, case law and convention. |
Dalalka qaa sida Ingiriiska ma laha dokumenti adag oo sheegaya xuquuqda aasaasiga ah; awoodahaas sharci dastuurku wuxuu ka kooban yahay sharci qoran oo sharci dejintu ansixisay, sharciga kiiska iyo mucaahado. |
A case named Entick v. Carrington is a constitutional principle deriving from the common law. |
Kiis lagu magacaabo Entick v. Carrington waa qodob dastuuri ah oo laga soo dheegtay sharciga caadiga ah (common law). |
John Entick's house was searched and ransacked by Sherriff Carrington. |
Guriga John Entick waxa baadhay oo si xun u fatashay Sherriff Carrington. |
Carrington argued that a warrant from a Government minister, the Earl of Halifax was valid authority, even though there was no statutory provision or court order for it. |
Carrington wuxuu ku dooday in waaran ka timi wasiir Dawladda ka tirsan, Earl of Halifax uu ahaa awood sax ah, in kastoo aanu jirin qodob sharci sharci-dejintu ansixisay ama amar maxkamadeed oo khuseeyaa. |
The court, led by Lord Camden stated that, |
Maxkamadda, oo uu guddoominayey Lord Camden waxay sheegtay in, |
"The great end, for which men entered into society, was to secure their property. That right is preserved sacred and incommunicable in all instances, where it has not been taken away or abridged by some public law for the good of the whole. By the laws of England, every invasion of private property, be it ever so minute, is a trespass... If no excuse can be found or produced, the silence of the books is an authority against the defendant, and the plaintiff must have judgment." |
"Dabayaaqo fiican, taasi dadku ku noqdeen bulshada, waxay ahayd inay xaasiliyaan hantidooda. Xaqaasi waa la xafiday, la sharfay oo laga hadli karin marnaba, halkaasi oo aan loo qaadayn ama gaabinayn sharciga dadwaynaha qaarkii danta guud darteed. Sida ay dhigayaan shuruuca Iglaan (England), la wareegid kasta ee hantida gaar loo leyahay, daqiiqadna ha noqotee, waa xadgudub... haddii cudurdaar aan la heli karin ama soosaari karin, aamusnaanta buugaagtu waa awood ka dhan ah eedaysanaha, dhibbanuhu waa inuu yeesho xukunka." |